The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference (Paperback)
Review
“The best way to understand the dramatic transformation of unknown books into bestsellers, or the rise of teenage smoking, or the phenomena of word of mouth or any number of the other mysterious changes that mark everyday life,” writes Malcolm Gladwell, “is to think of them as epidemics. Ideas and products and messages and behaviors spread just like viruses do.” Although anyone familiar with the theory of memetics will recognize this concept, Gladwell’s The Tipping Point has quite a few interesting twists on the subject. For example, Paul Revere was able to galvanize the forces of resistance so effectively in part because he was what Gladwell calls a “Connector”: he knew just about everybody, particularly the revolutionary leaders in each of the towns that he rode through. But Revere “wasn’t just the man with the biggest Rolodex in colonial Boston,” he was also a “Maven” who gathered extensive information about the British. He knew what was going on and he kn … >>> Save Money at Amazon.com
I read this book in part of one day – it’s a good, quick read. Unlike some of the people who didn’t care for the book – I never read the New Yorker article. It may be that the book doesn’t add enough new info to excite folks who have read that article. But to me the book threw out a good number of new ideas and concepts very quickly and very clearly. I found his ability to draw a nexus between things that, on the surface seem very divergent, was very interesting, and he did it smoothly, without jumping around a lot.
The thrust of the book is that there are three things that can converge to bring about dramatic and perhaps unexpectedly fast changes in our society. These are the context (the situational environment – especially when it’s near the balance or ‘tipping point’), the idea, and the people involved. His point is that very small changes in any or several of the context, the quality of the idea (which he calls ’stickiness’, ie how well the idea sticks), or whether the idea reaches a very small group of key people can trigger a dramatic epidemic of change in society.
“In a given process or system some people matter more than others.” (p.19). “The success of any kind of social epidemic is heavily dependent on the involvement of people with a particular and rare set of social gifts.” (p.33).
He divides these gifted people into three categories: Connectors, Mavens and Salespeople. “Sprinkled among every walk of life … are a handful of people with a truly extraordinary knack of making friends and acquaintances. They are Connectors.” (p. 41). “I always keep up with people.” (p. 44 quoting a “Connector”). “in the case of Connectors, their ability to span many different worlds is a function of something intrinsic to their personality, some combination of curiosity, self-confidence, sociability, and energy.” (p.49). “The point about Connectors is that by having a foot in so many different worlds they have the effect of bringing them all together.” (p.51).
“The word Maven comes from the Yiddish, and it means one who accumulates knowledge.” (p. 60). “The fact that Mavens want to help, for no other reason than because they like to help, turns out to be an awfully effective way of getting someone’s attention.” (p.67). “The one thing that a Maven is not is a persuader. To be a Maven is to be a teacher. But it is also, even more emphatically to be a student.” (p.69).
“There is also a select group of people — Salesmen — with the skills to persuade us when we are unconvinced of what we are hearing.” (p. 70). He goes on to describe an individual named Tom Gau who is a Salesman. “He seems to have some indefinable trait, something powerful and contagious and irresistible that goes beyond what comes out of his mouth, that makes people who meet him want to agree with him. It’s energy. It’s enthusiasm. It’s charm. It’s likability. It’s all those things and yet something more.” (p. 73).
He then goes into the importance of actually gathering empirical data about ideas, and not just relying on theory or assumption to determine quality, or as he calls it, ’stickiness.’ He gives examples of where assumptions have been debunked with data. “Kids don’t watch when they are stimulated and look away when they are bored. They watch when they understand and look away when they are confused.” (p.102). “Children actually don’t like commercials as much as we thought they did.” (p. 118) “The driving force for a preschooler is not a search for novelty, like it is with older kids, it’s a search for understanding and predictability.” (p. 126) Hence why your three year old can watch those Barney videos over and over until the tape breaks – it becomes predictable after the third or fourth viewing. This is probably also why Barney suddenly falls out of favor when predictability is less important than novelty.
Finally, there’s a point he makes he calls the rule of 150. He starts with some British anthropologists idea that brain size, neocortex size actually, is related to the ability to handle the complexities of social groups. The larger the neocortex, the larger the social group that can be managed. She then charts primate neocortex size against known average social group sizes for various primates, other than humans. Then she plugs human neocortex size into the equation, and out pops 147.8, or about 150. Now that would be not so interesting, except that he goes on to talk about this religious group, the Hutterites. They are clannish like the Amish or Mennonites, and they have a rule that when a colony approaches 150, they split into two and start a new one. He follows that by noting that Military organizations generally split companies at 150-200. And then he talks about Gore – the company that makes Goretex, among other things. They have a ~150 employee per plant rule.
“At a bigger size you have to impose complicated hierarchies and rules and regulations and formal measures to try to command loyalty and cohesion. But below 150…it is possible to achieve the same goals infomally.” (p.180)
“When things get larger than that, people become strangers to one another.” (p.181)
“Crossing the 150 line is a small change that can make a big difference.” (p. 183)
On the whole, I thought the book sparked thought and converstaion, and will make me look at life and business a little differently. To me that’s a good book.
Despite an earlier reviewer poo-pooing this book for shallow insights, I beg to differ. This book is a fascinating and original take on what makes people behave in a certain way en masse. Tying together Paul Revere, Hush Puppies and many other very accessible ideas makes this book, that is in some ways very academic, read like a thriller. I read it in three sittings. It has an impact on several levels. One, as a marketer, it gave me insights into how word-of-mouth really works. I’ll be experimenting with these concepts for years. Second, as a member of society, I gained insight into why I am pulled this way and that by trends. If you enjoyed this, you’ll also enjoy the groundbreaking book by Robert Cialdini called “Influence, the Psychology of Persuasion.” It makes some of the same points. Finally, it makes me think that some savvy activists will find some ways to use these principles to start societal epidemics that will ultimately have a positive effect. I believe Gladwell has introduced a concept, “the Tipping Point,” that will have a wide-ranging impact on how we view the world and human behavior.